You are currently browsing the category archive for the 'Chelsea' category.
The departure of Jose Mourinho is perhaps the most and least surprising event of the week. It has been coming for a while; when the owner and the manager of a club have a dispute, there is but one winner and rarely, if ever, is it the man whose responsibility of picking the team. With hindsight, it is easy to say that the self-styled ‘Special One’ has been angling for this to occur since earlier this year. He has been injudicious to a certain extent in all of the ‘fights’ that he has provoked; the mask of diversionary tactics utilised to its fullest extent, anything to divert away from his players, their weaknesses overlooked in the media whenever they have been exposed on the pitch. This parting of the ways with Chelsea though highlights his own failings as much as it shows Roman Abramovich in an equally idealistic light.
The Urban Legend surrounding Abramovich’s involvement with English football would have you believe that he fell in love with the idea of owning a club having attended the Champions League clash between Manchester United and Real Madrid. Would that it were so romantic. It is reasonably certain that he likes football; he would not have invested in CSKA Moscow were that not the truth, even if his ‘interest’ in the Russian club is masked through sponsorship. Monies put forward for the benefit of the national team are easily dismissed as ‘political’, currying favour with the current occupant of The Kremlin or his acolytes.
It tends to be lost in the talk of ‘Ten Year Plans’ and Chelsea being self-sustaining within five years that Abramovich is first and foremost a businessman. Romanticising his involvement at the Club, portraying him as a benevolent investor is at best naive, more accurately delusional. The man is willing to pursue the glory associated with an English club winning in Europe but make no mistake, crunch time is coming; he wants a Return on his Investment. He may well have put the ownership of the club into his son’s name to protect its future. It is not an entirely altruistic step. If anything happens to him personally, no vultures can swoop to buy the Club on the cheap; they would have to pay more than a pretty penny to wrest the club from his family’s hands.
Motive though is perhaps the most perplexing aspect of his involvement. Yes, the money that can be made from football, particularly English football is certainly eye-watering. Why else would Glazer and co have invested in half of the top flight. Yet it is not the only reason. He does want success, he would not have achieved his own wealth were that not the case. However the size of the task ahead of him has, I think, hit him over the past six months. For two seasons, everything went Chelsea’s way in the Premiership. He could console himself with that whilst looking on in anguish as the Champions League evaded his grasp. Three semi-final defeats whilst favourites to progress to the Final hardly represents a guargantuan achievement. That he has spent £500m in pursuit of this dream is an indication that it is not an idle pursuit. Yet winning a Cup competition is more than pure skill. Each victor has their share of luck en route to the spoils. Liverpool dumped Chelsea out with a dubious goal and then won the trophy, well, no-one is quite sure how. Porto won the Champions League due to everyone of any note being eliminated beforehand. Porto beat Manchester United with a perfectly good Paul Scholes goal disallowed but of real consequence, there was no-one else in their scalps. Luck of the draw is an immense boost.
Yet Abramovich wants that but equally as important is the manner of victory. And in hiring Mourinho, it is probably certain that the style he craves could never be achieved. Mourinho is unlike Ferguson or Wenger. He builds his teams from a solid base at the back; the other two put their emphasis on flair and attacking technique, closer to George Graham in outlook. Yet he was a proven winner. Champion of Portugal, champion of Europe. Therein lies the rub; he traded flair for glory. The two are not mutually exclusive – Arsenal, Manchester United, Barcelona, Real have all proven that – but in Mourinho’s eyes, they are. The most telling example of that came after Arsenal won 5 – 4 at White Hart Lane. The ‘Special One’ dismissed it as a hockey score yet all fans and owners would rather win the League with a season of those results than one of 1 – 0 victories which makes the decision to hire him all the more surprising. Claudio Ranieri in his one season in charge under Abramovich gave him attacking football but curious tactical decisions. Mourinho was the polar opposite. Entirely rational but unattractive to watch. Success but no plaudits for the manner of victory.
Is Abramovich chasing the impossible dream? Financially Chelsea are a big club yet next week they will fall down the rankings as Arsenal declare results that will show them to be the second wealthiest club in Europe in terms of turnover. On the pitch, pragmatism must reign in flair at some point. To win the Champions League with verve and panache is rarely done; perhaps in the last decade on three teams have managed to do so. Abramovich wants the trophy twice in a similar time frame ignoring historical evidence that it is hard enough to win it once. How long any manager will last at Stamford Bridge without winning ‘Old Big Ears’ is up for debate. Style is as important as substance but one has to give way to the other to be totally successful.


